<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Blog</title>
        <description>Blog</description>
        <link>http://www.suretech.com/5925</link>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 21:25:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
        <item>
            <title>What is &amp;quot;Cloud&amp;quot; Computing Anyway?</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/12723/What_is_quot_Cloud_quot_Computing_Anyway</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><object width="170" height="138"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eRqUE6IHTEA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eRqUE6IHTEA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="170" height="138"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
            <author>Dana Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:16:21 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/12723/What_is_quot_Cloud_quot_Computing_Anyway</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Some Attention to The Infrastructure</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/12664/Some_Attention_to_The_Infrastructure</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>One of the concepts that often gets people interested in my work at SureTech.com is &quot;The Cloud.&quot;&nbsp; Usually people are interested in what it is and how to understand it.&nbsp;</p>
<p>I usually draw a fluffy cloud shape and outline a couple computers and servers on a napkin and explain how the cloud describes the almost infinite wires and connections between computers that is called the internet.&nbsp; And I describe how servers are designed to answer requests from thousands of clients.</p>
<p>In any case, people tend to like pen and napkins when explaining things and usually I get an aha or two.</p>
<p>The NY Times magazine today goes into some more detail, and goes so far as to call datacenters, the cloud, which is a slightly different focus I'll keep in mind on my next napkin session.</p>
<p>June 14, 2009 - via <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/14/magazine/14search-t.html">The New York Times</a></p>
<div class="byline" style="text-align: left">By TOM VANDERBILT</div>
<p><img height="156" alt="Known for its bean and spearmint fields, Quincy, Wash., is also home to rows of servers in a 500,000-square-foot data center that Microsoft built in 2006. " hspace="15" width="125" align="left" border="1" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/06/14/magazine/14search_190.jpg" ...]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:12:04 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/12664/Some_Attention_to_The_Infrastructure</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>We're Populer, I guess</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/12453/We_re_Populer_I_guess</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>We had a problem Saturday morning (4/4/09) with all of our websites that use any of our databases. It appears that someone attempted to hack into our site by trying various standard attacks and while, to the best of our knowledge, none of those attacks worked, the number of requests overwhelmed our server. I'll write a technical post about this soon when we've had a chance to more fully understand what happened. But I did want to let people know that we are back up and monitoring the situation. We apologize for any inconvenience. If you have any questions about the outage, please feel free to contact us.</p>
<p>I'm told by my friends at some more popular sites that this type of thing is standard for them. I guess that means we've become popular.</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 21:37:30 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/12453/We_re_Populer_I_guess</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Email Best Practices</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/12428/Email_Best_Practices</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">A client recently went to a meeting where he assumed an email he sent had arrived at his client's inbox.  When he learned it did not, he became alarmed and called us.</span></span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'Times New Roman';font-size:16px;">I investigated and found the email in his outbox.  I also found that it was over 4MB and the end recipient's email box would not accept it.  I thought it important to highlight some key email tips in the current world of spam blocking email inbox overload:</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">We offer best in class email solutions for you.  Its simply the nature of email now (versus 5 years ago) that with so much spam and in turn spam software email is not as reliable as it once was.  Almost 90% of email out there is spam! </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">A few good measures to follow to ensure your message gets across are:</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:medium;"><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">*       never send large files through email.  Always send them as a zip file<br /><br />
*       if you send a mission critical message, be sure to call to follow up that it has been received<br /><br />
*       if you send a file to have on hand at a business meeting, bring a copy of it on thumb drive as well to be safe</span></span><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:11pt;"><br /></span></font> </p>]]></description>
            <author>Dana Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:51:24 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/12428/Email_Best_Practices</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Avoiding Great Service but Bad Value</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/12331/Avoiding_Great_Service_but_Bad_Value</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>13 Hours and $1,400.00 To upgrade my Hard Drive?!?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Weve always said that Managed Services for IT is usually a flawed business model.  Pretty much the better job you do the less you make.  Kinda like lawyers, I guess, except at least we talk about it!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>13 hours to reformat and upgrade a client laptop is the perfect example of providing GREAT service at a TERRIBLE value.  I worked over a long day and night replacing the hard drive of this particular laptop.  Theres no question the client got a lot of benefit.   3.5x more storage space, 3x improvement in speed.  And almost no worries  he handed me the laptop in the morning and came back for it the next day fully upgraded.  I couldnt save him from a couple headaches, though  he had to hunt down passwords that needed to be reached in his browser .... and he had to see my 13 hour bill!  Which points to the value problem  the work took 13 hours, but no one wants to pay labor of 13 hours for 3.5x space and  3x speed.  Think of it this way  the 320GB drive cost less than $100 and the 3x speed was just getting the computer back to the speed it was the day he bought it.  Who wants to pay almost the cost of the computer to simply set (or in this case reset) it up?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ill tell you: nobody.  But whats the alternative?  It takes hours and hours to set these things up  so we as a Managed Services Provider are stuck  either provide poor value by charging for our time or give ...</p>]]></description>
            <author>Seth Spanogle</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:56:22 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/12331/Avoiding_Great_Service_but_Bad_Value</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Backups, Backups, Backups</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/12305/Backups_Backups_Backups</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">Ive been thinking a lot about backups recently for a variety of reasons.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">First, Ive been involved in setting up a fund to honor the high school teacher who first taught me the importance of good backups. He hired me to help with the high school mini-computers and one of my major jobs was to backup the system every day to magnetic tape. When we lost a hard disk (lighting and computers just dont mix well) we always could recover with a recent tape. I learned a lot of lessons from that first job and one that particularly stuck in my mind was the importance of regular backups and taking backups off-site. Because of that job, I can be a bit maniacal about backups and archives.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Times New Roman';">Second, I had to recreate a website we worked on a couple of years ago. We had archived the source when we decommissioned our source control server just a few months ago. But when we shut down the website, wed not remembered to download a copy of the database. In my development work, however, I knew Id had at least one copy of the database on my development machine while we were working on it, but Id deleted it a year or two ago. However, I make it a practice to burn an archive DVD of my work at the end of each year before I clean off files that are no longer needed so I had a good feeling that I had some reasonable version of the database archived. I pulled out my archive from a couple of years ago and found the database pretty easily. With that and the source code, we were ...</span></p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:30:23 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/12305/Backups_Backups_Backups</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Running Windows Update on Windows Server Core</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/11044/Running_Windows_Update_on_Windows_Server_Core</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>We're running Windows Server 2008 core on our backup domain controller. I'm not completely convinced this is a good idea yet (even though I'm the one who suggested it). The lack of a UI seems to really hobble some functionality. Today I wanted to run windows update on that machine and had a difficult time figuring out how to do it. I would have thought there was an MMC plug-in to do it, but I couldn't find one. I searched using Google and found this <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa387102(VS.85).aspx">interesting VBS script</a>. Which did the trick.</p>
<p>For SureTech employees, the script is saved away in my user directory on the backup domain controller. You'd want to run this by typing: </p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Courier New';">cscript wupdate.vbs</span></p>
<p> </p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:28:53 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/11044/Running_Windows_Update_on_Windows_Server_Core</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Windows Authentication and IIS - Seems Counterintuitive to Me</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/11013/Windows_Authentication_and_IIS_Seems_Counterintuitive_to_Me</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm working on my first ASP.NET application in Visual Studio 2008 running on a 2008 Server. It's a simple thing, just designed to get some information from our users. I did need them to authenticate themselves against Active Directory prior to visiting the webpage. I turned on Windows Authentication and changed the security settings on the folder my application is in to allow only domain users and I removed the IIS_IUSRS user permission from the folder (on the assumption that I didn't want non-authenticated users to have access). Well, turns out I was wrong. That just generated an error on the site. Adding IIS_IUSRS back solved that problem.</p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:01:30 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/11013/Windows_Authentication_and_IIS_Seems_Counterintuitive_to_Me</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Apple Scores on Service </title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/11003/Apple_Scores_on_Service</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img width="105" height="127" align="left" hspace="18" alt="" src="http://imgdr.massmind.com/uploads/suretech/images/apple-logo1.jpg" />American based, for american customers - and email.</p>
<p>That's pretty much the price of excellent service these days. &nbsp;If you outsource your service to a place that doesn't care about your customers ... &nbsp;- <a href="http://suretech.com/11003/Apple_Scores_on_Service#disqus_thread">view comments</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:22:28 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/11003/Apple_Scores_on_Service</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Einstein Imagined SureTech.com</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/11002/Einstein_Imagined_SureTech_com</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img width="85" height="64" hspace="5" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://imgdr.massmind.com/uploads/suretech/images/einsteinshow.jpeg" />Who are we to argue with Genius? &nbsp;Einstein was ahead of us on the internet AND SureTech.com! - <a href="http://suretech.com/11002/Einstein_was_Presient#disqus_thread">View Comments</a></p>]]></description>
            <author>Dana Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:46:46 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/11002/Einstein_Imagined_SureTech_com</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>How does my web browser connect to a website?</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/9531/How_does_my_web_browser_connect_to_a_website</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 16px; ">When you type in somedomain.com your internet service sends a message to a machine called a name server owned by your internet service and asks this machine &ldquo;hey, where do I find the website for somedomain.com?&rdquo; - <a href="http://topaz.net/9531/How_does_my_web_browser_connect_to_a_website#disqus_thread">view comments</a></span></p>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
(function() {
		var links = document.getElementsByTagName('a');
		var query = '?';
		for(var i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
			if(links[i].href.indexOf('#disqus_thread') >= 0) {
				query += 'url' + i + '=' + encodeURIComponent(links[i].href) + '&';
			}
		}
		document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="http://disqus.com/forums/topaz/get_num_replies.js' + query + '"></' + 'script>');
	})();
//]]]]><![CDATA[>
</script>
]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:06:27 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/9531/How_does_my_web_browser_connect_to_a_website</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Happy Holidays 2008 from TopazGroup</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/9451/Happy_Holidays_2008_from_TopazGroup</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img width="190" height="107" border="1" align="left" alt="" src="http://imgdr.massmind.com/uploads/suretech/images/holiday2008static(1).png" />Love, Peace, Joy and all best wishes to you from Topaz Group.</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 09:37:33 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/9451/Happy_Holidays_2008_from_TopazGroup</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>That's NOT What I Meant By &amp;quot;Cleaning Up the Audio&amp;quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/9140/That_s_NOT_What_I_Meant_By_quot_Cleaning_Up_the_Audio_quot</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>My church records it's Sunday morning services so we can put the sermon on our website for people to listen to who miss a Sunday. I'm in charge of getting the CompactFlash card out of the recorder, bringing it home, editing the audio down to the sermon, and placing it on the website. Last week I realized I couldn't find the CF card from the previous Sunday. I have three that I rotate through (so I have two at home and one in the recorder) so it wasn't a big deal, except it meant I had missed the service. I kept looking around and I knew it would turn up. And today, it did (exactly where I was afraid it would). When I pulled on my pants I felt something in my pocket - a nicely washed and dried SanDisk CF card.</p>
<p>Thankfully, I do keep the CF cards in their plastic case, but I was dubious about whether the card would make it through. I looked the card over and it didn't look damaged. So, I plugged it in to my card reader thinking that it might actually work and - surprise, surprise - it did. The audio looks just fine and I'll get it edited shortly.</p>
<p>Using Google to search for &quot;Compact Flash cards in water&quot; turned up <a href="http://digitalapplejuice.com/musings-on-washing-machines-and-compactflash-cards/">this story</a> about a much more abused card than mine. Guess I didn't really have any reason to worry about it working.</p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:47:30 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/9140/That_s_NOT_What_I_Meant_By_quot_Cleaning_Up_the_Audio_quot</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>But I am an Administrator</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/9125/But_I_am_an_Administrator</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>It's annoying when the things designed to protect us just get in our way. Today I was doing some work on our file server and wanted to check out some ways to see how much disk space was being used by certain clients without having access to their folders (I'm still not sure if that's possible, but this happened along the way). In searching around I discovered the fsutil tool and wanted to play with it a bit. I used remote desktop to log in to our administrative server, opened a command window, and typed an fsutil command. The error that was returned to me was:</p>
<p><span style="font-family:'Courier New';">The FSUTIL utility requires that you have administrative privileges.</span></p>
<p>At which point I wanted to scream - But I Am an Administrator.</p>
<p>So, I looked around to make sure. Yes, I was in the Domain Admins group which was in the Administrators group. Looked like I was good to go. I had logged in with my admin account rather than my normal user accout. Hmm, what was up?</p>
<p>I searched on Google and thankfully came across a comment in <a href="http://www.realgeek.com/forums/please-help-printer-administrator-problem-370506.html">this post</a> that reminded me that Windows 2008 requires you to explicitly run the command window as an administrator. I right-clicked on the cmd icon, selected Run as Administrator, and voila! the fsutil command ran. Not that it gave me the information I wanted, but it ran.</p>
<p> </p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 22:20:56 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/9125/But_I_am_an_Administrator</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Book Review: Network Warrior</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8959/Book_Review_Network_Warrior</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>We've been having some interesting network issues that I've been tracking down and we've been trying to figure out how to set up our clients with our datacenter in Miami. I came across a book whose title looked interesting - Network Warrior by Gary A. Donahue. It is an O'Reilly book, so I was pretty confident I'd learn at least something from it (O'Reilly has done a great job building up their brand - goes to show you how powerful a good brand can be). So, I picked it up. I didn't really need everything that was in the 500+ pages (it is very Cisco centric, which I gathered from the subtitle) but it had a lot of useful information about networks in general. I read some parts completely and skimmed others (since we're not using Cisco) and definitely learned a lot.</p>
<div style="float:right;"></div>
<p>While I have over two decades of experience with computers, I am a novice with networks and I appreciated the chapters on switches, VLANs, routing and Quality of Service. It was written well enough that I could understand the basics and the graphics he used helped me understand the concepts.</p>
<p>Donahue has some great comments in the back about how to sell your ideas to management and how to be more professional (instead of just a techie).</p>
<p>Overall it was certainly worth my time reading this. If you are interested in a better understanding of how networks and network transports work, this would be a useful read. If you're a network expert and don't need to deal with Cisco equipment, it's probably a waste of time.</p>
<p> </p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:16:01 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8959/Book_Review_Network_Warrior</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Windows System Restore Saves the Day Again</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8909/Windows_System_Restore_Saves_the_Day_Again</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm a big fan of Windows System Restore and today reminded me of just how great a feature it is. Hats off to the folks who thought it up and implemented it.</p>
<p>I was installing a new VPN client on my main machine and, foolishly I will add, had two different VPN clients (one using IPSec and one using SSL) connected already. When I installed the new VPN client, about halfway through the install both of my current connections were severed and my machine went into an automatic shutdown. No problem I thought, I'll either uninstall and reinstall the VPN or just continue the VPN install and I'll be fine. Well, this install leaves something around to let it know an install was in process. Perhaps I could have figured out what that was and cleared it, but I figured it was a safer bet just to restore the system to the point before the install. Sure enough, there was the restore point waiting for me. I restored back to that point in time and re-ran the install (not connected through the VPN this time!) and everything worked out nicely.</p>
<p> </p>]]></description>
            <author>David McKinnis</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:08:33 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8909/Windows_System_Restore_Saves_the_Day_Again</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Cloud Computing: Is It Safe?</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8879/Cloud_Computing_Is_It_Safe</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;line-height:14px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:arial;font-size:16px;font-weight:bold;line-height:normal;"><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202425665205">Cloud Computing: Is It Safe?</a></span> </span></p>
<p class="byline" style="font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;font-weight:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);line-height:13px;text-align:left;"><img width="128" height="128" hspace="15" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.law.com/images/128_pics/window_shutter_cloud.jpg" />By Alan Cohen from Law.com<br style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11px;line-height:14px;" /><a class="source" style="text-decoration:underline;font-size:11px;font-family:Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;font-weight:normal;color:rgb(51,51,51);line-height:13px;" href="http://www.corpcounsel.com/">Corporate Counsel</a><br style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11px;line-height:14px;" />
October 31, 2008</p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11px;line-height:14px;text-align:left;">If there's one tried-and-true way to tackle a problem, it's to make it someone else's problem. It's the strategy that's given us plumbers, fluff-and-fold laundry and lawn services. Yet for a long time, corporate computing didn't really lend itself to the pass-the-predicament model. Sure, you could hire consultants to troubleshoot your hardware, patch your software and get all the PCs and servers talking to one another. But at the end of the day, it was your system -- and your headache.</p>
<p style="font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:11px;line-height:14px;">Delegators take note: The times are changing. An increasingly popular software model tries to make things simple by -- get this -- literally making things simple. Known as Software as a Service or <a class="linelink" style="font-size:11px;line-height:14px;font-family:Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;color:rgb(0,51,102);text-decoration:underline;" href="http://www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/pubArticleLT.jsp?id=1202422543832">cloud computing</a>, the idea boils down to this: Instead of running an application yourself, using your own equipment and IT staff (not to mention ...</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:57:39 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8879/Cloud_Computing_Is_It_Safe</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>IT Trends For 2009</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8878/IT_Trends_For_2009</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>We are pleased to share these trends via <a href="http://www.baselinemag.com/c/a/Infrastructure/IT-Trends-for-2009/?kc=EWWHNEMNL11132008STR1">Baseline</a>:</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;"></span>Organizations are increasingly looking to next-generation social networking tools to conduct sophisticated business intelligence and analytics. In many cases, they are mining data and looking for trends and patterns, such as which salesperson has the relationships to pull off a deal or which customers seem to have the biggest influence with others online.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;"><img width="250" height="154" align="right" hspace="20" border="1" alt="" src="http://imgdr.massmind.com/uploads/suretech/images/SaaS.png" /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size:12px;line-height:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;">Cloud computing environments will contribute to the expansion of SaaS into areas beyond ERP, CRM and HR management systems. <span style="background-color:#FFFF00;">Rob DeSisto, analyst for Gartner, says organizations increasingly see the benefits of moving large-scale software expenses from the capital budget to the operating budget</span>.</span></span></p>
    <p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color:rgb(51,51,51);font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;"></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size:12px;line-height:normal;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;">Saavy IT managers are now looking for ways to automate and embed security and compliance processes across the value chain, including on mobile devices. Surprisingly, a key challenge is one of perception, not technology. Companies must get over the idea that security and compliance systems are simply insurance against problems, and that they dont improve the business in ...</span></span></p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 21:13:56 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8878/IT_Trends_For_2009</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Google Message Filtering and StartLogic</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8833/Google_Message_Filtering_and_StartLogic</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>One of our consulting clients has a huge problem with spam (mostly because their previous website displayed their email addresses for all to see in plain text which made life easy for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_address_harvesting">email harvesters</a>). The other problem is that some of their email addresses are very common and thus also targeted by spammers. But, to some degree, our client doesn't care why they're getting all that spam, just that they are. And it's a lot. After struggling with the tools the web host they are using provided, I decided to look at some additional tools and <a href="http://www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/security/compare.html">Google's Message Filtering</a> came to my attention. If you are only interested in inbound filtering (which we are) you can get it for just $3/account/year. Since our client is highly price sensitive and has a large number of email accounts (they are a volunteer organization and the email addresses can stay the same when the volunteers change) this seems like a great deal.</p>
<p>It's powered by Postini, so the back end looks good. But, I like to try these things out before rolling them out to customers. So, I decided I'd sign up my business domain for the service. I get a little bit of spam, generally it's caught by the filters in Outlook or on my server. I was using StartLogic, which I'd been signed up with for about five years. To make a long story short, after much gnashing of teeth and trying different things, it turns out that StartLogic's mail servers can't handle the Google Message Filtering service. I believe it has to do with the way the MX records are described and how StartLogic figures out which domain the mail belongs to, but I'm not sure.</p>
<p>So, I decided ...</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:42:51 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8833/Google_Message_Filtering_and_StartLogic</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What do I do with this email warning me of a virus?</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8802/What_do_I_do_with_this_email_warning_me_of_a_virus</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>Any mail that has obviously been forwarded as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chain_letter">chain letter</a> warning of just about anything, even if the warning is true is almost guaranteed to be some specie of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)">SPAM</a>.  Sometimes messages like this refer to partially true threats, but the goal of the originator of the message is to get many people to forward the message which creates at best a an annoying kind of virus effect.  Sometimes messages like this contain attachments of links that are harmful payloads themselves.<br /><br />
Basically any time an email says PLEASE FORWARD THIS, it is very likely to be misleading, false or worse.<br /><br />
The only way for an average user to know of a new severe particular threat is to read it in the mainstream media or from your technology team.  <br /><br />
In conclusion the message should be ignored, but the general rule that you should never open attachments that you are not very sure about holds true.  Very sure means you know the sender and ALSO recognize BOTH the email message and the attachment as a legitimate communication from the sender.<br /><br />
If any of the sender, the message or the attachment dont make sense the instructions below apply.  But because of the state of SPAM these days, mass forwarding of email is almost never an effective way of communicating this information or any information unfortunately.</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:35:01 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8802/What_do_I_do_with_this_email_warning_me_of_a_virus</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Sum Ergo Sum</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8699/Sum_Ergo_Sum</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><img width="144" height="208" hspace="12" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://imgdr.massmind.com/uploads/suretech/images/LoveIsKiller.png" />I just picked up <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Love-Killer-App-Business-Influence/dp/060960922X&amp;tag=mnov-20">Love is the Killer App</a> at a café wherein Tim Sanders describes love as the ultimate competitive weapon in business.  I have a friend whos making a go for the fourth year working at home with her husband so they can be close to the kids.  And now a claim for change to equality and justice has won our presidential election.  Has the world gone sugary sweet on us?</p>
<p>I have nothing against corporations or even republican conservatism.   But neither the means nor the end ever seemed as important to me as the manner of the journey; and love, equality and justice have always felt like better principles for a manner than achievement, winning and owning for their sake alone.   These fundamentals that ring so true in every heart seemed absent often from the rhetoric of success Id often hear.</p>
<p>But sometimes getting out into the sun reveals more scenery than you guess.  I met two brothers yesterday, who described themselves as the original LinkedIn.    Though they sold insurance, most of their day was connecting people and businesses to each other and to funding. Their courting of VCs and VC target companies was strategic, to be sure, but a complete indirection to selling insurance.  The direction was to expand their network, to participate in community and thereby simply by being known, succeed at insurance.</p>
<p>Almost be existing they are flourishing, Sum Ergo Sum.  This strikes me as a lot more productive than fighting to convince a client of my value.  By sharing it is easier to receive, and we get to more malt syrup  or is it?  Its easier to believe in love and sharing when everybody with ...</p>]]></description>
            <author>Dana Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:56:08 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8699/Sum_Ergo_Sum</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Why you need &amp;quot;The Cloud&amp;quot;</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8544/Why_you_need_quot_The_Cloud_quot</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><object width="170" height="138"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/eRqUE6IHTEA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/eRqUE6IHTEA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="170" height="138"></embed></object></p>]]></description>
            <author>Dana Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 08:48:03 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8544/Why_you_need_quot_The_Cloud_quot</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Startup Business Models: One Chicken vs RocketBoom</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8139/Startup_Business_Models_One_Chicken_vs_RocketBoom</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p> <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size:14px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS';font-size:12px;">There are basically two ways to start a business that I'll call the buy a chicken model and the RocketBoom model.</span>
</span>
Rocketboom was the first videoblog to roll out a daily show and build a large audience successfully.  As the first it commands a fairly permanent piece of popular consciousness around video blogs.  The hundreds and thousands of video blogs that came later will grow, prosper and fail in due course, but the first stands singularly and as such keeps a momentum that is incredibly valuable. Another example is Amazon.  Now in 2008, the Amazon business model could be repeated with the application of enough dollars.  They have established the generall model of a find anything online store.  But no one will be able to buy being the first and largest and thereforem most memorable find anything online store no matter how much they pay they'll always be just a copy cat.
</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:33:50 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8139/Startup_Business_Models_One_Chicken_vs_RocketBoom</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>Xobni for Outlook is awesome except it doesn't work.</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/8135/Xobni_for_Outlook_is_awesome_except_it_doesn_t_work</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: 14px; font-style: italic; "><img align="left" width="115" height="82" border="1" hspace="8" alt="" src="http://imgdr.massmind.com/uploads/suretech/images/XobniBillEndorse.png" />Xobni which is inbox spelled backwards is an absolutely terrific plug in for Microsoft Outlook except for the small fact that it doesn't work... - <a href="http://suretech.com/8135/Xobni_for_Outlook_is_awesome_except_it_doesn_t_work#disqus_thread">view comments</a></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
(function() {
		var links = document.getElementsByTagName('a');
		var query = '?';
		for(var i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
			if(links[i].href.indexOf('#disqus_thread') >= 0) {
				query += 'url' + i + '=' + encodeURIComponent(links[i].href) + '&';
			}
		}
		document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="http://disqus.com/forums/suretech/get_num_replies.js' + query + '"></' + 'script>');
	})();
//]]]]><![CDATA[>
</script>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 07:25:23 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/8135/Xobni_for_Outlook_is_awesome_except_it_doesn_t_work</guid>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title>What's your job?</title>
            <link>http://www.suretech.com/7396/What_s_your_job</link>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>This may seem like a silly question to some, but I think it's often easy for us to forget what our job really is. I'm going to write this from the perspective of a Software Developer, but it applies equally well to all job functions.</p>
<p>As programmers, we have often been tricked into thinking that we should be writing code all the time and anything less and were not being productive enough. I know I often struggle between writing code  which I enjoy, have some skill in, and can easily see my results  and doing other important project tasks.</p>
<p>When I was working on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_word">Word for Windows 6.0</a> (and there's a whole 'nother story about why it was numbered 6.0 rather than 3.0, since it followed Word for Windows 2.0  the short quote is 6 is larger than 3) Chris Peters (who has since left Microsoft and brought the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_Bowlers_Association">PBA</a> back into prominence) at one of our team meetings made it clear to us that, in order to ship Word 6.0 we needed to remember that our job wasnt to write code or test code or any of those things. Our job was to ship Word 6.0. Now often that would mean, as developers, we should write some code (or fix some bugs) but we needed to think each day about what we could do that day to help ship Word 6.0. Some days that would mean not writing new code (and new code is the worst  it has to be tested, localized, documented, etc.). Sometimes, the best way to finish the project would be to talk with our program manager and see about cutting a ...</p>]]></description>
            <author>Alberto Molina</author>
            <source>SureTech.com</source>
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:45:57 -0400</pubDate>
            <guid>http://www.suretech.com/7396/What_s_your_job</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>
